Studio: Paramount Pictures
Director: Andre Ovredal
Writer: Zachary Donohue, T.W. Burgess
Producer: Walter Hamada, Gary Dauberman
Stars: Jacob Scipio, Lou Llobell, Melissa Leo, Joseph Lopez, Miles Fowler, Alan Trong
Review Score:
Summary:
A couple living life on the road experiences supernatural terror when they become targets of an evil entity who haunts travelers.
Review:
Tyler couldn’t possibly be more excited about quitting his job and giving up his possessions to live life on the road in a van. Sharing her boyfriend’s dream must have sounded like a good idea when she decided to make the same sacrifices, but Maddie has second thoughts now, although she does a much better job of sharing her true feelings with “Passenger’s” audience than she does with telling Tyler.
While packing up to move out of their Brooklyn apartment, Maddie stares wistfully at a “Home Sweet Home” welcome mat, one of the only items, along with Chekhov’s GPS tracker, that didn’t make it inside a box. Six weeks later, the couple camps in a residential neighborhood outside an ideal suburban home cheerily celebrating a child’s birthday. The view through the window gives Maddie another opportunity to look down with a frown as she contemplates the compromise she made about having a family. “Passenger” has to communicate her unfulfilled desires somehow, and this method is easy enough, though the stale delivery makes it difficult to see Maddie as a human rather than a fictional character working her way through standard film formula.
“Passenger” doesn’t always follow expected conventions, however. After Tyler proposes marriage, Maddie drives their van down a dark road at night while pensively fiddling with her new engagement ring, since she’s not yet ready to put it on her finger. On cue, she drops the diamond on the floorboard, and there’s no better time to reach for it than right as a speeding, swerving vehicle attempts to pass her on the rainy road.
Surprisingly, it’s not Maddie and Tyler’s van that crashes into a tree, which is what happens to distracted drivers in 99 out of 100 movies. It’s the other car, whose bloodied driver crawls out of the wreck only for an unseen presence to quickly pull him back in to finish him off. Whatever killed the man vanishes instantly, leaving just three suspicious slash marks carved into the car’s trunk. Whatever killed the man has now marked Tyler and Maddie too, which begins a highway haunting that terrifies the two of them with relatively tame supernatural shenanigans.
Of course, Maddie and Tyler won’t get too many details regarding what’s going on until Emmy and Oscar winner Melissa Leo reappears for the second of her two short scenes as “Old Lady Exposition,” and that won’t be until late in the last act. Until then, Maddie, Tyler, and “Passenger” viewers have to trudge their way through a scarcity of scares mostly made from moments like waving flashlights across dark objects, a lot of looking over one’s shoulder at shapes that quickly disappear, and an obsession with St. Christopher poised to make more than a few non-Catholics question the film’s oddly religious theme.
The titular villain essentially operates as an undefined stalker who merely looks like a run-of-the-mill vagrant, a counterintuitively amusing visage considering the movie’s repeated references to “hobos,” whenever “Passenger” grants a brief glimpse of him. He doesn’t speak. He barely has any backstory. He’s just an entity who upsets Maddie by doing things like making her van mysteriously jump further away whenever she turns her head during a tense trek through a parking lot. Sure, that’s a weird thing to happen, and undoubtedly disturbing for Maddie. But are spatial anomalies visually exciting or especially unsettling to a passive audience?
After breaking out with indie hits “Troll Hunter” and “The Autopsy of Jane Doe” (review here), Norwegian director Andre Ovredal fully cemented himself as a notable name in horror with “Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark” (review here). But Paramount’s “Passenger” follows on Universal’s “The Last Voyage of the Demeter” (review here) as a disappointing decline into bigger-budget titles that seemingly suffer from studio standardization. A common one-size-fits-all script furthers the feel of a “quota” project where no one involved had a burning urge to tell an amazing story or get particularly creative; it seems more like ordinary work to fill in a mandatory line on a corporate spreadsheet. “Passenger” fits the textbook definition of an average thriller, and from conception through to release, it doesn’t look like there was ever any plan for the movie to hit a higher mark.
Review Score: 50
Fitting the textbook definition of an average thriller, “Passenger” seems like ordinary “quota” work to fill in a mandatory line on a corporate spreadsheet.