WINNIE-THE-POOH: BLOOD AND HONEY II (2024)

Studio:   ITN Distribution
Director: Rhys Frake-Waterfield
Writer:   Matt Leslie, Rhys Frake-Waterfield
Producer: Rhys Frake-Waterfield, Scott Jeffrey
Stars:    Scott Chambers, Tallulah Evans, Ryan Oliva, Teresa Banham, Peter DeSouza Feighoney, Alec Newman, Simon Callow

Review Score:


Summary:

Amid another massacre, Christopher Robin uncovers a shocking secret from childhood that connects him to the murderous Winnie-the-Pooh in a terrifying way.


Synopsis:     

Review:

Move over, Amityville. Your name is mud, and has been for many years now.

When it comes to DIY indie horror, the new king of cash-grab cheats is "public domain pilfering." The instant any classic character from cartoons, comics, films, TV, or books has its copyright expire, we can count on frothing vultures to swoop in and scoop up that property for royalty-free use in some B-movie, usually of the bargain bin variety. These producers are the filmmaking equivalent of ambulance-chasing lawyers, ghoulishly gaining gigs simply by being first at the crime scene, then creating a crime scene of their own with whatever chintzy creature feature they cough up.

Since we're still some time away from Blumhouse or a Hollywood studio spending real money on a clever reimagining that might transform a beloved childhood icon into a truly chilling monster, we have to first deal with the fledgling franchise now known as the "Poohniverse," which started in 2023 with the first "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey" film, and currently threatens further expansion by trying to make Pinocchio, Bambi, and The Mad Hatter the new Freddy, Jason, and Pinhead. Before adding those other ex-Disney employees into the mix, however, we must make it through one more murderous misadventure with the 100-Acre Wood roster in "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey II."

The original "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey" (review here) was almost universally derided as a scattershot slasher that would have rightfully whizzed by unnoticed if not for its tenuous connection to A.A. Milne's famous creations. Early buzz on the sequel indicated "Blood and Honey II" would be better in terms of story, performances, and overall production quality, none of which had high bars to begin with anyway. "Better" isn't the right word. I'd instead say "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey II" is "marginally more tolerable," as it's only slightly less shabby than its predecessor, although I can't be sure if its improvements were intentional or just incidental.

You may remember Pooh and Piglet were the only two anthropomorphic animals to appear onscreen in the first film. You may also remember Piglet was bludgeoned to death with a sledgehammer. Apparently, he survived, because Piglet returns in this sequel only to be killed almost immediately when his snouted head is definitively blown off with a shotgun blast. Piglet's regenerative ability earns an explanation later in the movie, but maybe he'll become this series' Kenny and we can expect to see him experience another gruesome demise in every subsequent sequel.

Owl takes Piglet's place for the bulk of "Blood and Honey II." Tigger drops in as well, though it's mostly just Pooh and Owl serving up slaughter, essentially mirroring the first movie's paltry pairing of only two Winnie-the-Pooh characters while the rest of the 100-Acre Wood's denizens remain unseen or unused.

The two terrorizers are no longer men in cheap Halloween masks. Now they're men in cheap makeup, a minor upgrade over lazy latex coverings, yet still a copout to avoid crafting a full-body design that looks like anything other than an ordinary person in a costume and cowl. Bert Lahr looked more like a lion than Tigger looks like a tiger here. He's laughably loaded into what seems to be a straight-jacket to complete his "this is just a guy in regular clothes" appearance. Meanwhile, Pooh often shows up in silhouette, as though the filmmakers wanted to hedge their bet on being legally "safe" by not letting lawyers get too good of a look at anything.

One upgrade that does work is the replacement of the previous Christopher Robin actor with a different performer. "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey II" boasts some surprisingly serviceable acting for several roles, though Scott Chambers operates on a completely different plane as Christopher. Chambers's dramatic portrayal of Pooh's friend-turned-target for vengeful violence is far better than expected, and frankly far better than a fright film needs at this low level.

"Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey" only did the bare minimum. "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey II" puts in a pinch more effort, but it still takes the easy road whenever possible. Even with a little extra money added for small upticks like fire FX and a higher body count that includes dozens of dancers dying at a rave, it's still impossible to overlook the cheapness of it all. "Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2" takes a shot at telling an actual story this time around, which is worth noting, yet some corner-cutting on later plot points and a lot of stitched-on scenes that only exist for inconsequential victims to get torn apart make for messy momentum.

The glaring issue overall is, neither of these movies ever feel like true takes on "Disney envisioned as horror." Pooh and company don't feel like evil versions of familiar storybook characters you grew up on. The forest setting doesn't feel like a nightmarish reflection of the 100-Acre Wood. It's just masked men in an off-the-rack wardrobe cutting up phony-looking limbs while digital blood sprays the screen. And when there's no more meat than that on such bare bones, what does either "Blood and Honey" movie have going for it other than a flavor-of-the-month gimmick they never actually take advantage of?

NOTE: There is a mid-credits scene.

Review Score: 30