Studio: New Line Cinema
Director: Zach Cregger
Writer: Zach Cregger
Producer: Zach Cregger, Roy Lee, Miri Yoon, J.D. Lifshitz, Raphael Margules
Stars: Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, Alden Ehrenreich, Austin Abrams, Cary Christopher, Toby Huss, Benedict Wong, Amy Madigan, Sara Paxton, Justin Long
Review Score:
Summary:
A macabre mystery unfolds in a quiet town when 17 schoolchildren inexplicably vanish during the night at exactly the same time.
Review:
Schoolteacher Justine Gandy thought it was weird when young Alex Lilly was the only one of her 18 students who showed up for class one morning. The situation grew even weirder when authorities soon learned why Alex was alone. At exactly 2:17am the night before, the other 17 children inexplicably left their homes, outstretched their arms, and ran into the darkness where they disappeared without a trace.
One month later, the police aren’t any closer to uncovering any clues. With Maybrook Elementary set to finally reopen, school administrators host a community meeting to calm frustrated parents. Unfortunately for Justine, all the angry mob wants to do is burn her with imaginary torches formed from accusations, suspicions, and demands for Justine to reveal whatever sinister secrets they are certain she must be hiding.
Once this foundation firms up, “Weapons” continues forward as an experiment in storytelling that’s more about the telling than it is about the story. Unfolding in a nonlinear pattern whose chronology comes together gradually, the movie divides itself into dedicated chapters delineated by six unique character arcs: Justine; Archer, Justine’s loudest detractor and the father of a missing child; Paul, a police officer who’s also Justine’s part-time fling; local burnout and petty burglar James; Justine’s boss and school principal Marcus; and finally Alex, the quiet boy who somehow avoided whatever fate befell his classmates.
For having a plot whose pathway is obscured by so many unknowns, “Weapons” isn’t as driven by its mystery as one might presume. The case of the missing kids functions more as an inciting incident for quiet character studies until the focus finally flips into intensified action that ties together these initially separate threads with increasing clarity. As “Weapons” molts the feathers of psychological suspense to become a pseudo-tour through a saddened section of an ordinary neighborhood, a viewer’s thoughts center less on the how and why of what happened and more on the everyday lives that intersect, sometimes tangentially, because of the unsolved tragedy.
It's here where opinions will diverge as some may feel moderately misled by the movie’s apparent promise of chilling suburban horror along the lines of writer/director Zach Cregger’s previous feature, “Barbarian” (review here). “Weapons” has its share of graphic shocks, to be sure. But its broader interest lies in examining the people involved, even if their involvement doesn’t play any critical role in primary proceedings.
During one such sequence that’s heavier on unnecessary development than on delivering drama, Archer’s hunch about where the children might have gone takes him to a neighbor’s house. There, the mother of another missing child declines Archer’s request to review Ring camera footage of her daughter’s disappearance despite Archer being in a similar situation. Undeterred, Archer sits in his car outside until the woman’s husband, Gary, comes home. Archer’s ambush results in Gary almost immediately inviting Archer inside to watch the video while his wife stands in a doorway with her disapproving arms crossed. From the footage, Archer observes similarities between their two missing children’s behavior. Gary and his wife are then never seen again, leaving one to reasonably wonder why the movie needed this many minutes just to point Archer’s armchair investigation toward a new direction.
“Weapons” makes an odd habit out of inessential interactions. Toby Huss is a terrific character actor who can now add “underused” to “overlooked” as a descriptive adjective. Huss plays a police captain whose daughter Donna is dating Paul, the police officer having an affair with Justine. He’s also responsible for routinely dismissing Archer’s demands for updates with boilerplate bureaucracy designed to assure the grieving father that the police are “doing all they can do.”
Looking back on him, however, Huss’s role doesn’t directly impact the main narrative. From what we learn of his connections to Archer, Paul, and Donna, it isn’t even clear if his part plays into possible themes the others come into contact with, such as complacent domestic partnerships, distractions from depression, or lying to loved ones.
Ambiguous or conflicting purposes between various elements stop “Weapons” from being the fully realized, multilayered experience some may misread it to be. During a nightmare sequence where a massive assault rifle bearing the number 217 appears in a lightning-streaked sky, the thought occurs that “Weapons” might be leading into commentary likening Maybrook’s missing children to the uniquely American epidemic of school shootings. With the school seeming at least somewhat concerned with protecting their staff from any culpability and the police depicted as being entirely useless, there are at least hints of systemic failures having a hand in ensuring the current problem won’t be solved soon without genuinely worried rogues like Justine and Archer taking matters into their own hands.
Maybe a moral message along those lines lurks deeper in the details, but academic-minded determination would be required to find a distinct parallel definitively linking “Weapons” to something like the guns-in-schools issue. Because once the movie moves from cerebral dread to tangible explanations, the ultimate reveal and accompanying spikes of tone-tearing comedy can make everything that came before feel like a whole lot of hullaballoo, arguably leading to only a quick trick whose reduced substance makes it retroactively appear like not every minute in the two-hour runtime was entirely purposeful.
Which isn’t to say those two hours aren’t engaging. They are. They just have trouble continuing to feel fulfilling once the complete picture fills in.
At a minimum, “Weapons” takes some turns and makes clever choices that combine for creative cinema. On a technical level, the camera tries a couple of subtle moves that hold a viewer’s attention even in instances when onscreen action might momentarily stall. One prime piece of blocking occurs when Donna angrily struts after Justine in a liquor store, and the camera dizzyingly sways with each turn down an aisle as one woman swings to one side and one swings out of frame toward the other. Equally imaginative in understated simplicity, there’s a great upward-turned shot of Justine trying to talk to Alex that puts the spray-painted word “witch” behind her when she and the camera tilt down to the boy’s lower level.
“Weapons” works its way from a cryptic trail of slowly dropped breadcrumbs into a chaotic climax, though the winding path taken there hits a fork in the road where different tastes will find varying values in the movie. The overall experience should still be satisfying, either as atmospheric immersion, an acting showcase, or for sudden hits of explosive horror. Although if that last item is what one wants most, be advised that the ratio of creeps and cringes to conversations and excisable activities isn’t balanced evenly throughout the course of what can at times be an overdesigned film.
Review Score: 65
Once its foundation firms up, “Weapons” continues forward as an experiment in storytelling that’s more about the telling than it is about the story.