THE FIRST OMEN (2024)

Studio:   20th Century Studios
Director: Arkasha Stevenson
Writer:   Tim Smith, Arkasha Stevenson, Keith Thomas, Ben Jacoby
Producer: David S. Goyer, Keith Levine
Stars:    Nell Tiger Free, Ralph Ineson, Sonia Braga, Tawfeek Barhom, Maria Caballero, Charles Dance, Bill Nighy

Review Score:


Summary:

A novice American nun travels to an Italian orphanage where she becomes embroiled in a shocking conspiracy to birth the Antichrist.


Synopsis:     

Review:

If you only watch one of the two 2024 thrillers where an aspirant American nun travels to Italy to deal with a devilish pregnancy, I'd recommend "Immaculate" (review here) over "The First Omen." "Fun" would be a wildly inappropriate descriptor. Let's instead say there's a dementedness to "Immaculate's" demon dealings that make its higher energy more consistently engaging. And since it takes 30 fewer minutes to tell literally the exact same story, "Immaculate" also maintains a more fluid flow that has less of a dependency on slow-burn atmosphere to buffer long spans between fiery visual chills.

On the other hand, if you prefer an even darker tone that's arguably “eviler” in terms of how intangible eeriness sneaks under goosebumped skin, "The First Omen's" unnerving texture may be more your bag. With a free-rolling camera and provocative score full of hypnotic hums and unholy operatic shrieks, the film snatches its haunting style right out of the 1970s, making it a fearsomely fitting prelude for the Gregory Peck classic it's meant to precede.

When a first scene features both Ralph Ineson and Charles Dance as grim-faced, gravel-voiced priests, you know the movie came to play; especially since Dance's face only occupies the screen for maybe 20 collective seconds, yet "The First Omen" was determined to include his gravitas anyway. At the same time, it's come to my attention that this pre-title piece was added after the fact following focus group feedback (hence Dance's one-and-done minute of screentime), and I've no reason to think otherwise since it fully feels like an unnecessarily added sequence.

In this scene, Ineson's Father Brennan, a character who carries over to the original "The Omen" via Doctor Who #2 Patrick Troughton, has a cryptic conversation with Dance's Father Harris inside a church confessional. While mincing words about a secret conspiracy to birth the Antichrist, Harris passes Brennan a photo of a baby they believe was bred to be The Devil's mother. I feel like I should put "SPOILER" before what comes next, except "The First Omen" does such a negligent job of protecting what I assume is supposed to be a twist, I'm not sure it's essential.

When novice nun Margaret (Nell Tiger Free) arrives at an orphanage in Rome, she immediately bonds with troubled 12-year-old Carlita. An ostracized orphan prone to violent outbursts and strange hallucinations, Carlita reminds Margaret of herself at that age, since she too suffers from visions and also grew up without parents.

Spoon-fed exposition wants viewers to think Carlita is the Antichrist vessel the priests spoke of in the prologue. But "The First Omen" goes so far out of its way to imply the photographed baby could be someone else that it doesn't take a mathematician to add that up with Margaret's nebulous background and conclude, long before the film finally confirms, that Margaret, not Carlita, actually possesses the womb that was manipulated for manufacturing Damien. I get that "The First Omen" wanted to start with ominous implications, but the suggestions planted in that Ineson/Dance scene really undermine the reveal of Margaret's unknowing role in the satanic scheme.

By nature of being a prequel to a film whose outcome is already known, "The First Omen's" additional fumble on Margaret's true purpose means the movie doesn't have a lot to offer as far as legitimate suspense goes. There is one genuine twist later down the line, more of a wrinkle really, although it doesn't do much besides set up a potential sequel to this prequel. I tried to craft a clue to allude to what I'm talking about for those in the know. That's a tough task though, so we'll simply say it involves a number/amount.

However, "The First Omen" does have quite a bit to offer on levels like entrancing imagery, nightmarish ambiance, and invested performances from all of the aforementioned actors plus Bill Nighy and Sonia Braga. There's a great deal of cinematic capital invested in the fantastic photography, heavily talented cast, strict seriousness of the movie's temperament, and "The First Omen" reaps dividends on the payout with cerebral unease and captivating character portrayals. The film is a little tamer than word of mouth claims, but it will still put palms to the open mouths of those who flinch at daring shocks like a demon hand emerging from between a pregnant woman's legs.

Now, I'm aware of the notion that a film should be assessed individually and not against another film. But we can't realistically pretend like "The First Omen" and "Immaculate" weren't released within two weeks of each other. They also contain so many blatant similarities, I'm surprised there isn't plagiarism litigation against one of them. Even lesser details, like both Nell Tiger Free and Sydney Sweeney's nuns having free-spirited roommates and the main male villains getting stabbed in their throats, are ridiculously identical.

So again, I'd say which one wins comes down to who you like best as the leading lady, whether you want "The First Omen's" insidious feel or "Immaculate's" subversive wickedness, and if you favor a pace that's more measured or one that glides with more urgent furiousness. Personally, I'll take "Immaculate's" gnarlier chaos over "The First Omen's" hollower hand-on-shoulder jolts and sleepy scenes of peeling potatoes, though that's just me. Whichever way anyone leans, both films feature Antichrist frights that are unsettling enough to be creepy as well as entertaining.

Review Score: 65