Studio: Neon
Director: Chris Stuckmann
Writer: Chris Stuckmann, Samantha Elizabeth
Producer: Aaron B. Koontz, Cameron Burns, Ashleigh Snead, Chris Stuckmann
Stars: Camille Sullivan, Brendan Sexton III, Keith David, Sarah Durn, Derek Mears, Emily Bennett, Charlie Talbert, Robin Bartlett, Michael Beach
Review Score:
Summary:
A woman’s investigation into her sister’s disappearance uncovers a demonic connection to an abandoned town’s haunting history.
Review:
Longtime viewers of “found footage” horror are highly likely to think, “Here we go again” almost as soon as “Shelby Oaks” starts. Initially presented as yet another fictional documentary about a paranormal investigation gone wrong, a montage of faux news clips interspersed with talking-head interviews sets up a tale that’s seemingly been told countless times since “The Blair Witch Project.”
In 2008, Riley Brennan, host of the goofily named YouTube ghost-hunting show “Paranormal Paranoids,” disappeared along with her three content collaborators while recording in Shelby Oaks, an abandoned town located in ominously named Darke County, Ohio. Featured as the documentary’s key interviewee, Riley’s sister Mia fills in some blanks in Riley’s history by providing future clues concerning her sister’s proclivity for vivid night terrors, their mother’s habit of carving their initials as triangular shapes on trees, and a dark figure that had been haunting Riley since childhood. As this basic background builds, viewers digest a steady diet of “found footage” standards like a tearful first-person confessional, close-ups on Mia’s trembling hands, and clips of skeptical commenters calling Riley a phony while armchair sleuths offer their own theories via response videos.
Just when it seems as though “Shelby Oaks” will fully submerge itself in the drowning waters of “found footage” familiarity, the movie abruptly pulls the plug on that format. About 16 minutes into the runtime, Mia’s interview gets interrupted by an unexpected visitor who does something shocking, and “Shelby Oaks” immediately transforms into a traditional film. Anyone who has ever watched “found footage” and thought, “I wonder how this could play out if it were conventional instead,” can now experience firsthand what, if any, difference that makes.
Technically, “found footage” doesn’t completely go away. It’s just that when new video is revealed from this point forward, viewers watch it alongside Mia, who takes over as the film’s main player on a desperate quest to finally find out what really happened to Riley.
Mia’s search for her sister ends up taking Mia and the audience on a tour through a wide array of genre tropes. Locations related to Riley’s disappearance include a haunted prison, a deserted amusement park, a creepy cabin, and a remote house in the woods, i.e. some of the most common backdrops possible for a fright film. Scenes feature things like a nighttime search conducted by flashlight, a secret cellar hidden beneath floorboards, and more than one research montage, even one where newspaper articles whiz by like they’re on a microfiche machine even though it’s actually a computer.
All of these places and moments are then connected by the gradual uncovering of an occult conspiracy involving a demon, which sounds like one more cliché for the pile, though this is where “Shelby Oaks” manages to earn a reasonable amount of intrigue. Seemingly geared more toward horror newbies who aren’t as seasoned on these sorts of things, “Shelby Oaks” drops the right amount of mystery here and there to keep the story simmering. Add in engaging visual designs for dilapidated buildings like the decaying prison, a rotting woodland home, and a rusted Ferris wheel, and there’s ample atmosphere here where even an experienced veteran can see unsettling eeriness, never mind how commonplace its conception might appear.
Where “Shelby Oaks” does itself its greatest disservice is in not fully following through on the fiction. Already skating on thin ice with cynics who won’t take to the premise, the third act in particular opens wide gaps in the plot that are either overly cryptic or go completely unexplained. There’s no need for a tidy bow to lay all exposition on the table, but there are glaring holes that have an especially hard time holding up when looked back on with a “wait a minute” reflection.
In an earlier era, “Shelby Oaks” might have been able to earn a modestly higher score. The wide release year of 2025 is at least 10, if not 20 years past the peak when “found footage” frames and a mysterious disappearance in a cursed town were capable of attracting more attention from eager audiences. Because the movie is made with an appreciative eye for its obvious influences, open-minded viewers can still find worthwhile frights in between recycled narrative beats. More of a ”side of the road” stop than destination entertainment, “Shelby Oaks” would fit well in a midnight movie or faux documentary marathon, just not as the centerpiece draw.
Review Score: 60
More of a ”side of the road” stop than destination entertainment, “Shelby Oaks” would fit well in a faux documentary marathon, just not as the main draw.