IN A VIOLENT NATURE (2024)

Studio:   IFC Films/Shudder
Director: Chris Nash
Writer:   Chris Nash
Producer: Peter Kuplowsky, Shannon Hanmer
Stars:    Ry Barrett, Andrea Pavlovic, Cameron Love, Reece Presley, Liam Leone, Charlotte Creaghan, Lea Rose Sebastianis, Sam Roulston, Alexander Oliver, Lauren Taylor

Review Score:


Summary:

Inadvertently resurrected when campers remove a necklace from his gravesite, a supernatural killer embarks on a gruesome murder spree in the Canadian woods.


Synopsis:     

Review:

Have you ever watched a "Halloween" movie and wondered what Michael Myers was up to during the many minutes he wasn't featured onscreen? Or maybe a "Friday the 13th" sequel had you wishing for a better look at exactly how Jason Voorhees moved so effortlessly from a secret hiding spot to being directly in the path of a fleeing victim?

That's the gimmick of "In a Violent Nature," a slasher film that takes place entirely from the killer's perspective, except for an uneventful ending that suddenly, oddly ignores the premise. "From the killer's perspective" doesn't mean "In a Violent Nature" is "found footage" shot in first-person to give viewers the killer's eyes. Rather, the movie takes a third-person approach by keeping its camera behind the killer's back or within his arm's reach as he stomps, stalks, and slaughters his way through a forest filled with unsuspecting campers.

By design, "In a Violent Nature's" slender story includes many hallmarks of classic slasher horror. Everywhere you look, you'll see countless similarities intended to echo the origins and M.O.s of virtually every cinematic psychopath to ever chop through teens, trees, and tropes.

According to local legend, a prank gone wrong led to a bullied boy's accidental death on the site of a logging business 70 years ago. The lumberjacks responsible for killing both the boy, Johnny, and his father ended up viciously butchered. A witness saw someone in an old fireman's mask carving up the men, leading some to wonder if Johnny's spirit somehow returned for revenge from beyond the grave.

In customary horror hero fashion, Johnny remains tied to the ground where he originally died by a necklace his father gave him as a memento of Johnny's dead mother. Leave it to Troy, the least-liked friend among a septet of campers, to greedily swipe the gold jewelry for his girlfriend, unknowingly unleashing Johnny for another blood-soaked murder spree. Intent on recovering the stolen pendant so he can be put back at peace, Johnny becomes a brutality-fueled buzzsaw whose new rampage aims to make his original massacre look like mere child's play.

In being a rare slasher film that follows its action from over the killer's shoulder, "In a Violent Nature" inadvertently illustrates why we probably don't see this concept more often. It turns out there's a good reason for horror movies to regularly swing the lens away from Michael, Jason, and Johnny whenever they're not making mayhem. It's because what they're usually doing in between decapitations isn't terribly intriguing.

"In a Violent Nature" features quite a lot of Johnny just walking around. When I say, "a lot," I mean a lot. No seriously, it's a lot. However much you're guessing it is, it's more. A lot more. Come up with a conservative number of minutes you think it is, double that, and you're probably halfway to the actual total. That's how much of this movie consists of Johnny merely traveling from one point to another.

The movie's ardent admirers argue tedium is part of the point. "In a Violent Nature" deconstructs the slasher formula not for purposes of parody or academic study, but to flip the format so familiarity is seen from a different angle. As an intention, that's all well and good. Put into practice, partnering a viewer with the killer deflates the typical tension that comes from not knowing where evil lurks or what it intends.

I'm all for a leisurely stroll through nature, but when it comes in the form of a film supposedly telling a terror tale, I need more pop than what the back of a man's head against a forest background provides. Gorehounds should at least get some pop out of the creative kills, which include one I don't believe I've seen before (involving drag hooks and Johnny's victim on a cliff), and which are gruesome enough to wind up the movie's energy until the respites in between wear it down once again.

At a minimum, "In a Violent Nature" will be remembered as "that slasher from the masked murderer's POV." As such, it's something longtime fright fans should see simply for the relative novelty, although I can't imagine the movie having the pull to be an evergreen entry viewers will crave to watch again and again. Better than a majority of indie slashers on similarly low budgets, "In a Violent Nature" remains interesting as an experiment, and I'm appreciative of writer/director Chris Nash daring to do something different in a subgenre that can always use a clever shot in the arm. If there's a sequel, I just hope there's more story than setup next time so the follow-up doesn't also feel like a film filled with entirely too much B-roll.

Review Score: 55