Studio: Universal Pictures
Director: Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Tyler Gillett
Writer: Stephen Shields, Guy Busick
Producer: William Sherak, James Vanderbilt, Paul Neinstein, Tripp Vinson, Chad Villella
Stars: Melissa Barrera, Dan Stevens, Kathryn Newton, Will Catlett, Kevin Durand, Angus Cloud, Alisha Weir, Giancarlo Esposito
Review Score:
Summary:
Tables are turned on a group of kidnappers when they become locked inside an isolated mansion with a little girl who turns out to be a vengeful vampire.
Review:
Every time a new "Star Wars," Marvel, or DCU project makes an announcement, online discourse gets dominated by heavy-sighing accusations of supposed "Star Wars" and superhero fatigue. It doesn't make sense that fans would want less, not more, of something they presumably love. Nevertheless, perceived declines in popularity and profitability end up attributed to the existence of too many movies, which can turn keeping up with everything into a second job.
Horror has its own versions of similar situations. For quite a while after the success of "The Blair Witch Project," the genre was drowned in nonstop waves of "found footage" films everyone eventually grew tired of. "Scream" birthed a new slasher boom whose various waxes and wanes over ensuing years have been the subject of countless retrospective editorials. And the less said about anything "Amityville," the better.
Curiously, no one ever seems to say much about "vampire fatigue," even though someone really should. In fact, someone should have said something before Universal Pictures pumped no less than three Dracula-related films into theaters in the 12-month span between April 2023 and April 2024.
"Renfield" kicked things off with Nicolas Cage as a bombastic Drac in a dark comedy centered on The Count's insect-eating lackey. "The Last Voyage of the Demeter" (review here) went for more traditional chills with its expanded origin story set during Dracula's ocean journey from Transylvania to London. "Abigail" then brought up the back end. I've seen some seesawing on how much of a Dracula movie "Abigail" really is. Given that "Abigail" opens on a sequence set to the same "Swan Lake" song used in the Bela Lugosi original, and that a certain person claims he's "gone by many names over the countless years," the movie doesn't do anything to downplay the notion that it's at least peripherally connected to the classic character.
All three movies found some supporters, although all three movies underperformed to the point where they're considered commercial disappointments. So why would people fail to turn out all three times for three completely different uses of Bram Stoker's sensational creation?
Frankly, vampires just aren't as compelling to modern audiences anymore. They're fixtures of folklore from a bygone era when people needed a scary story to frighten children or explain odd events, and they no longer fulfill those functions. We've since seen them transform into various animals, combust in sunlight, howl at crucifixes, and drink so much blood that everything they do is no longer novel. If you want to make vampires exciting again, you have to do something radically different. And simply plugging one into a plain plot where a small-sized fangster tears through a half-dozen hapless heisters isn't enough to sustain a 105-minute movie.
At some point in its history, "Abigail" held the secret up its sleeve that the titular 12-year-old, a budding ballerina who is kidnapped by criminals out to extort her fearsome father for ransom, is actually a vicious vampire champing at the bit to turn the tables on her unsuspecting abductors. Keeping that twist under wraps was too much for the movie's marketing to handle though, so virtually everyone who has seen a trailer or a talking point already enters the movie well aware of the surprise in store.
That leaves "Abigail" with more setup than story as it turns into a mere meat grinder of chases, decapitations, neck bites, and impalings featuring single-note characters. The cast stocks up on popular genre actors, hoping their natural charms can compensate for underwritten alter egos, except slim scripting stunts them from forming personas with pop to remain consistently engaging.
With everyone outfitted in Rat Pack code names, Kevin Durand plays Peter, a muscular meathead relegated to a Rob Gronkowski role where he's constantly the butt of dead-horse gags highlighting his dimwittedness. Angus Cloud gets his own dopey joke to beat into the ground as his stoner's unwanted advances are repeatedly rebuffed by Kathryn Newton, whose character asks, what if the hacker stereotype was also trust fund trash? The sole trait for Dan Stevens's Frank is that he's a surly hothead who thinks he's too suave for this eclectic crew. Will Catlett's ex-Marine marksman barely sticks around long enough to register. Melissa Barrera rounds out the roster as the requisite crook with a heart of gold who builds a motherly bond with Abigail. Because what would a cinematic kidnapping even look like without such a sympathetic character?
The team flirts with a few romantic possibilities that fizzle out about as fast as they flicker on. Other than that, they're only grist for the mill once Abigail bares her fangs and bears down on exposed necks. "Abigail" attempts to introduce a minor mystery about who's behind the bloodshed at the beginning, but again, the whole concept of the film is "vampire girl flips the script," so there's no suspense in any angle of some mystery man maybe being locked inside the abattoir with everyone.
If you want to see impossible amounts of blood gush, spray, create waterfalls, fill pools, and explode crimson colors like the world's worst version of a gender reveal, well, "Abigail" at least has that. Stylish though these visuals may be, their repetitiveness wears thin after the umpteenth scene of something or someone bursting apart. That level of gooey gore might be enjoyable enough to placate horror hounds hungry for the kind of action Radio Silence is famous for. Others who want to gnaw on more fresh meat than old bone, on the other hand, may find "Abigail" too lean on substance to be truly tasty.
Review Score: 55
At least the movie only runs 70 minutes, though I suppose that extra 10 technically disqualifies it from being a literal amateur hour.