STUDIO 666 (2022)

Studio:     Universal Pictures
Director:    BJ McDonnell
Writer:     Jeff Buhler, Rebecca Hughes
Producer:  John Ramsay, James A. Rota
Stars:     Dave Grohl, Nate Mendel, Pat Smear, Taylor Hawkins, Chris Shiflett, Rami Jaffee, Whitney Cummings, Leslie Grossman, Will Forte, Jenna Ortega, Jeff Garlin

Review Score:


Summary:

The Foo Fighters face supernatural slaughter when they try to record an album in a cursed mansion with a gruesome history.


Synopsis:     

Review:

It probably goes without saying that if you’re a Foo Fighters fan, you’re destined to dig “Studio 666,” a silly, splattery horror-comedy where the band’s playful personalities are featured front and center for almost every minute of the movie. No matter how goofy it gets, the Foo faithful are certain to forgive flightiness and just have as much fun watching the film as it looks like the band had making it. Besides, if the Kiss Army can put “Kiss Meets the Phantom of the Park” on a pedestal of B-movie bizarreness, why can’t Dave Grohl and company indulge in outrageous cinematic antics too? Rock music and genre films could use more creatively kooky crossovers.

What if you’re not a Foo Fighters fan? “Studio 666” might make you one.

Despite Nirvana and then Foo Fighters being mainstays of popular music in my teens and twenties, neither band made much of a mark on me. Somehow I got the impression of Dave Grohl being an immature scrub who lucked into millionaire musicianship, so I considered his songs overplayed and overrated.

That changed when I saw Foo Fighters perform in 2007. I didn’t see them by choice. They were opening for The Police’s reunion tour. With my arms folded, I went into their show carrying a “well, whatever” attitude. At least I’d be able to say I saw a band that everyone else apparently loved for reasons I didn’t understand.

Now, I’ve seen live performances from eclectic artists ranging from Ray Charles and James Taylor to Judas Priest and U2. Alanis Morissette and King Diamond to Iron Maiden and Paul Simon. I can honestly say that Foo Fighters put on one of the best concerts I’ve ever witnessed and I was sitting so high up in Dodger Stadium that there was a sound delay between what was happening onstage and when the music reached my ears. Their energy was electric. Their rhythms were airtight. At one point, Dave decided he didn’t like the tempo and had everyone restart a song. Brian Wilson is the only other person I’ve seen orchestrate his band like that. I went away that night a converted man. Foo Fighters put on a performance that was professional, polished, and amazingly entertaining, and I was a bozo to expect a lesser outcome. I think if someone goes into “Studio 666” feeling about Foo Fighters the way I did prior to 2007, they could come away wearing the same smile I had after that Dodger Stadium show.

Like the band, the movie is very much a Dave Grohl-centered project. So of course, individual mileage will vary according to how much or how little entertainment someone gets out of Grohl himself.

Since Foo Fighters fans are already accounted for, I still say skeptics can be swayed by Grohl’s endearing persona, which translates terrifically into a naturally charismatic screen presence. A college kid could get away with writing a term paper that treats “Studio 666” as a metaphor for a celebrity’s ego growing increasingly chaotic as creative obsession destroys everyone around him. It’s just told as a cheeky terror tale of demonic possession involving an ancient Aleister Crowley grimoire, a supernatural portal, and a 44-minute song that the band can’t seem to finish writing. Grohl basically becomes a big kid eager to parody the pretentious rock star stereotype, and he does so with self-effacing style that’s game to give Foo Fighters some Marx Brothers dynamics as they exorcise any real-world animosity by barking scripted insults at one another.

It’s easy to warm to Grohl because of how good he is at comedy. He doesn’t merely recite what’s written. He has line deliveries down pat. There’s an early scene where a realtor points out bespoke lighting fixtures in the cursed mansion where the band plans to record their next album. Grohl moves between his marks and responds, “I do love a good sconce” with a perfectly pitched tone to make that joke land. Grohl is genuinely present in each make-believe moment, and he and director BJ McDonnell come prepared with a plan to make a real movie as opposed to a series of awkward skits.

The rest of the Foos come with varying degrees of chemistry, and equally variable acting abilities. “Studio 666” often only uses them for expressive reaction shots as cutaways, though they do develop into distinct characters closer to the climax.

You can almost tell which scenes were shot in what order. Guitarist Pat Smear goes from sporting a bemused smirk while lightly trotting in one scene to fully embracing the finale’s manic insanity with cartoonish physical comedy. Initial stiffness gives the sense that the band wasn’t quite sure what they were doing in this movie, but they figure it out by the end, or at least decide to go all in on getting wild.

No comedy ever rolls out nonstop bangers, although “Studio 666’s” gags hit more often than they miss. Predictable snips still offer mild amusement, like Grohl annoying a roadie (Slayer’s Kerry King) by repeatedly moving his snare drum a quarter-inch to get the perfect sound, or keyboardist Rami Jaffee exploiting the image of a lusting, yet spiritually synched, lothario looking to lay down the love on Whitney Cummings. Better bits include possibly ad-libbed banter about “Waterworld” being one of the best movies of the past 30 years and the band ending pow-wows with a “Pearl Jam high-five.” (“Jeremy has f*ckin’ spoken!”)

With Doritos products stuffed everywhere you look, “Studio 666” comes across as a pretty slight movie, though that’s by design. It has a super simple setup for a story not meant to be taken too seriously. Quick cameos from notable names don’t intend to amount to much more than momentarily funny distractions. Everyone probably thought, “Foo Fighters horror movie?” and understandably said yes before thinking to ask for a script.

Partly because willful cheesiness makes it play like a TV movie without actually looking like one, I ended up thinking of “Studio 666” like one of the vintage Scooby-Doo team-ups that featured Mama Cass or Sonny and Cher. As in, it’s an iffy amalgamation of music, mayhem, and the macabre, but you roll with the concept’s craziness because of the weird fun factor. Foo Fighters didn’t set out to remake Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining,” after all. “Studio 666” is closer to a satire of Peter Jackson’s Beatles documentary “Get Back,” except with satanic slaughter wreaking havoc on the band’s ridiculous recording sessions.

Review Score: 70