6:45 (2021)

Studio:     Well Go USA
Director:    Craig Singer
Writer:     Robert Dean Klein
Producer:  Craig Singer
Stars:     Augie Duke, Michael Reed, Armen Garo, Ray Mancini, Remy Ma, Sabina Friedman-Seitz, Sasha K. Gordon, Leonardo Mancini, Allie Marshall, Joshua Matthew Smith, Thomas G. Waites

Review Score:


Summary:

A couple vacationing on an unusual island becomes caught in a time loop where every repeating day ends in their deaths.


Synopsis:     

Review:

Why is the movie called “6:45?” Maybe someone wanted a terrible title that tells viewers absolutely nothing, or whose pedestrian plainness offers no enticement to wonder, “What’s this about?” much less smash the ‘Play Now’ button.

6:45 is also the time when an analog alarm clock wakes Bobby Patterson every morning. He and his girlfriend Jules have come to the oddly named town of Bog Grove for a quiet island getaway. They spend the day browsing sunglasses, playing pinball on the pier, bantering with barflies, and bending a knee to propose turning their troubled relationship into a marriage. Then they spend the evening having her throat slashed and his neck snapped by a hooded figure.

When Bobby wakes at the same time the following morning, he assumes their deaths were a dream. When innocuous events play out exactly as they did the day before however, Bobby starts experiencing a distinct sense of déjà vu. Hearing the innkeeper’s strange story about a vacationing couple mysteriously murdered several years ago doesn’t make Bobby any less agitated. Neither does getting killed by the hooded figure once again, despite taking a different route through town.

Dying twice confirms Bobby and Jules are somehow stuck in a time loop that resets at 6:45am. And yet for some reason, Bobby spends the next day not doing anything differently at all and barely making an attempt to tell Jules what is happening. In a sequence that plays like a filmmaking flub, Bobby still proposes marriage in the midst of all this mutilation. Then the camera jarringly jumps to a flashback of a random friend telling Bobby his romance won’t last. Somehow, they’re in the same coffee shop where Bobby proposed to Jules on this tiny island. The movie mentions that Bobby used to vacation in Bog Grove as a boy, but is this supposed to imply he goes there often, or did the producers just not secure a second location for this unnecessary scene with his friend?

Other instances of odd editing inspire intermittent head scratches too. One of the relived days is a multi-window montage of experiences from previous days. Is “6:45” suggesting Bobby is still doing everything exactly the same, or is he merely mulling memories in his head while trying to solve the mystery? Does it even matter when a movie is only mediocre?

Deciding it’s safer to stay in their room than to go out into town, Bobby and Jules spend the fifth day having sex a comical number of times not even a teenager going through puberty could keep up with. For laughs, I went back and counted. Since he checks the clock every time, we know Bobby and Jules have sex at 8:55, 11:47, 5:39, 7:37, 9:13, 10:12, and 11:11, with what looks like at least two more slow dissolves to the two leads dry humping slipped in there without timestamps. In one of those shots, the couple changes locations to go at it in a laundry room. Expending all that energy must have made Bobby momentarily forget his strategy of avoiding the killer by staying locked in their suite.

Eventually, and that’s a word doing a lot of heavy lifting, cryptic clues connect to a secret Bobby has been hiding. If he wants to rejoin reality, he’s going to have to tell Jules that secret in what has to be one of the lowest stakes reasons imaginable for powering a “Twilight Zone” premise.

Even after he figures this out though, Bobby goes all the way from day nine to day 100 without telling Jules the truth. Fortunately, we don’t have to sit through those 91 days. Still, you have to wonder about Bobby. Why would he go through this routine rigmarole that ends in his slaughter for three more months before finally doing something about it?

I’ve seen a lot of “Groundhog Day”-inspired thrillers about being caught in a time loop and “6:45” is, well, one of them. I don’t have a more favorable declaration than that. The movie starts off well enough with a serviceable setup, but questionable chemistry from the two leads, as well as the narrow consequences of their conundrum, creates very little sustainable intrigue.

I marked down “6:45” for an indifferent 50/100 score to reflect its room temperature heat as slow-burn suspense. Then I saw it won three awards for Best Feature and four for Best Director at seven different off-the-radar film festivals. Suspect events that only exist so indie filmmakers can pose with a statuette on a step-and-repeat aren’t a big bother. I take more of an issue with the slew of fake IMDb user reviews that tout “6:45” as the best thing to happen to cinema since the Lumiere brothers created their camera. So I knocked off five points, which is a light sentence frankly, as a punitive measure for trying to trick people into thinking “6:45” is an award-worthy film. Stooping to such scummy tactics says a lot about a movie’s true quality, and none of what it says is good.

Review Score: 45