WATCHER (2022)

Studio:     IFC Midnight/Shudder
Director:    Chloe Okuno
Writer:     Chloe Okuno, Zack Ford
Producer:  Mason Novick, John Finemore, Aaron Kaplan, Sean Perrone, Roy Lee, Steven Schneider, Derek Dauchy
Stars:     Maika Monroe, Karl Glusman, Burn Gorman

Review Score:


Summary:

After moving to Romania with her husband, an American woman comes to suspect an unsettling man watching her from across the street may be a serial killer.


Synopsis:     

Review:

“Watcher” starts with a straightforward “stranger in a strange land” setup. Julia, a former actress who appears to have abandoned her own dreams so her husband Francis can pursue his, just moved to Romania. Francis has the heritage there, so he speaks the language, but Julia barely knows more than a few basic Romanian words. She can’t easily order a coffee. She gets screamed at by a security guard for trying to take a prohibited picture in a museum. A fish very much out of water, being left on her own in Bucharest quickly becomes a burden for her, and it’s about to become a burden for others, too.

Julia can’t shake her suspicion that a silhouette in a window across the street stares directly at her every night. Already unsettled by the mystery man, Julia’s unease finds more fuel when she learns about a serial killer called ‘The Spider.’ Someone has been capturing women in their bedrooms and cutting off their heads. One survivor describes feeling as though she was being stalked prior to the attacker trying to suffocate her from behind. Could Julia’s weird watcher be connected?

Even more so than any average thriller, “Watcher’s” distinct gender dynamics make it a movie that will have different fear factors for different viewers. Not only will that factor be directly influenced by whether you’re a man or a woman, it’ll be colored by perspectives from personal experiences too.

I was once in a group conversation where someone brought up an old Aziz Ansari routine, one that he would ultimately depict in an episode of “Master of None.” In his standup set, Ansari asked how many women in the audience had ever been made uncomfortable by an unknown man following them. Ansari then told the men to look around and observe that every woman had raised her hand. He then asked how many men knew that this regularly happened and the men were apparently dumbfounded.

I can already hear how this sounds like a “not all men” defense, but I countered that only a psycho would ever casually stalk someone through a store or on the street. Myself and others at the table then swapped stories about how we’d been on the other end in misinterpreted instances that were not stalking situations at all. We would receive a non-verbal cue such as a woman looking over her shoulder to let us know we were walking too close, and then we would do something like drop our keys or tie our shoes to hopefully put more space between us so they’d know we had no intention of causing any kind of harm.

Here’s my most extreme example. One late night after a long day in Hollywood, I’m walking down a somewhat dim stretch of Franklin Boulevard, a section unpopulated by people or traffic, back to my car. I walk fast when I’m by myself anyway, but it’s also a chilly October evening and I’m anxious to get home, so I’m moving at a hastened pace. It isn’t until I get that first over-the-shoulder glance that I see there’s a woman walking alone in front of me. She’s letting me know she’s wary, and I don’t blame her one bit considering all of the conditions, so I slow down. A moment passes and she shoots me a second look. Now I realize, I’m only a block away from my vehicle and it’s on this side of the street, but I’m clearly making this person uncomfortable by being too close behind her, so I should cross to the opposite sidewalk and maybe she’ll feel safer. No sooner do I step off the curb to cross, she has the exact same idea and steps into the street at the exact same time. I’m immediately mortified as I hop right back onto the curb, except she had that same idea too. Now it looks like I’m mimicking her movements and what was definitely not a legitimate stalking situation absolutely looks like one for sure. With my hopeless attempts to make this person feel better likely only heightening her anxiety, I did the tying my shoes trick to slow everything down. She turned at the next side street, which, luckily for me, was no longer the direction I was headed, although she kept a cautious eye on me as I mercifully made it to my car before unnecessarily frightening this woman any further.

What does this have to do with “Watcher?” For the woman in my story, who possibly went home that night wondering how close she came to being attacked because I have no idea if I ever adequately conveyed that coincidence was being unkind, Julia’s experience will feel frighteningly real, and frighteningly relatable. One thing “Watcher” director Chloe Okuno does incredibly well is to weave a texture of simmering uncertainty, and then pull threads out of that tapestry to curl into strings of suspense. Maika Monroe tenses her shoulders, wells tears in her eyes, and emotes Julia’s journey from frustration to fear with acute awareness for how her actions reactively complement what’s unfolding within a given scene. How the camera carefully cuts off what we can see and the suggestiveness of certain shadows then tighten intensity in consistently creative ways.

On the other hand, for someone like myself who has the luxury of not dealing with the daily discomfort of being alone in an overwhelming city, alone and inebriated in an Uber, or worrying whether or not a cop will believe my complaint about someone suspicious, “Watcher” doesn’t have the same impact. My side of my story allowed me to go home only traumatized by embarrassment for unintentionally inflicting distress on a stranger. And when you have that ability to detach from Julia’s fight to be validated and vindicated against incessant accusations of hysterical overreaction, it’s easier to see “Watcher’s” nagging structural shortcuts.

Divorced from any #MeToo timeliness about a woman’s voice struggling to be believed, “Watcher” as a pure thriller suffers from stale similarities to numerous like-minded movies. Disbelieving husband. Dismissive authority figure. How many times do we have to put up with a premise that asks the question, “Is this really happening or is it all in her head?” when by virtue of the fact that we’re watching a horror film, we already know the main character isn’t crazy?

Devil’s Advocate could argue that “Watcher” employs those aforementioned stereotypes purposefully. It’s saying these are real men, the violent ex-boyfriends and disparaging store managers who are encountered regularly, that make Julia’s dilemma that much more difficult.

I could buy into that idea if “Watcher” wasn’t stocked with so many other tropes too. Exposition gets added using the top two most popular narrative cheats possible: an internet research sequence and someone serendipitously tuning into a local TV news broadcast at precisely the right moment. When the middle of the movie needs a quick fake-out scare after nothing substantial happens for a while, it chooses a predictable “this is actually only a nightmare” pop. Then there’s the introduction of a firearm that has one of the most conspicuous close-ups in the entire cinematic history of Chekhov’s guns.

Those slices don’t cause “Watcher” to be killed by a thousand small cuts. Solid suspense breaks chains created by clichés. In addition to Maika Monroe making Julia read sympathetically almost purely through physicality, Burn Gorman nearly upstages her as the quiet creep across the street. His erect posture; his closed stance; the way he sits with his palms placed neatly on his knees. Dressed in a plain brown coat with a plan haircut to match, he’s a guy who’d be difficult to describe to a sketch artist because of how ordinary he looks, yet your neck hairs know to stand alertly whenever you’re in his intangibly menacing presence.

By maintaining that mood of indeterminate danger always looming over Julia, “Watcher” holds a strong enough stride to pull its boots up over boilerplate plot points. There is more to the movie than just Hitchcockian style however, although the message rings differently to different ears. Whether you hear that chime loud enough to get anything more than atmospheric chills out of “Watcher” probably depends on whether you tend to be in the front or in the back when two strangers walk alone on a dark street.

Review Score: 65