HYPNOTIC (2021)

Studio:     Netflix
Director:    Suzanne Coote, Matt Angel
Writer:     Richard D’Ovidio
Producer:  Michael J. Luisi
Stars:     Kate Siegel, Jason O’Mara, Lucie Guest, Jaime M. Callica, Tanja Dixon-Warren, Luc Roderique, Dule Hill

Review Score:


Summary:

A troubled woman suspects her hypnotherapist may have manipulated her subconscious mind for nefarious purposes.


Synopsis:     

Review:

“Star Wars” fandom used to be a nostalgia nerd’s paradise for bonding over beloved films, action figures, and collectable Burger King glasses. Now that oasis has been overrun by an overzealous lynch mob who can’t stop complaining about “Kathleen Kennedy this” and “Kelly Marie Tran that.” It’s embarrassing to even identify yourself as a fan of the franchise nowadays, because you’re immediately associated with misogyny, racism, and infantile pouting about supposedly ruined childhoods. Keep in mind, all of this is over a fictional sci-fi soap opera originally created to entertain eight-year-olds.

It’s sad to say, but fright film fandom has been skewing toward toxicity too. In the horror community, Rob Zombie occupies Rian Johnson’s unenviable position as the prime Public Enemy who immediately draws ire at the mere mention of his name. Zombie cannot post a simple teaser photo on Instagram without igniting a predictable bombardment of nepotism accusations, chiefly focused on consistently casting his wife Sheri Moon Zombie in every one of his films.

What’s hilariously hypocritical about this is you never hear those loudmouths leveling the same charges against Mike Flanagan, who also casts his wife Kate Siegel in pretty much everything he does. To be abundantly clear, I’m not advocating that Zombie and Flanagan should be decried equally for stacking their casts with friends and family. I’m pointing out how absurd it is to contend that a filmmaker should commit years of his/her/their life to a project, and then insist that he/she/they shouldn’t be surrounded by familiar faces who are capable, comfortable, and proven fun to work with. “Sorry, I know we’ve been creatively collaborating for years now, but I’m gonna have to leave you off my next movie. Don’t want the ‘Mad Online’ contingent to accuse me of playing favorites again.”

Haters try to justify their lazy animosity toward Sheri by dismissively claiming, “She can’t act,” but that simply isn’t true. I challenge anyone who says that to cite a single time she was miscast in one of her husband’s films. The reality they’d prefer not to admit is that she’s been the best choice for every part she’s played, which certainly isn’t a coincidence considering Zombie writes those roles specifically for her.

When it comes to finding roles that fit their regulars, you can’t say the same thing about Mike Flanagan. If you don’t believe me, take another look at Henry Thomas trying to do a Jack Nicholson impression in “Doctor Sleep,” then try arguing that’s not a square peg fighting to slam into a round hole. Oh, and before anyone ignites any torches in my direction for criticizing Flanagan, kindly note that he’s easily in my top ten favorite genre directors of all time, and that list includes Carpenter, Romero, and other icons. “Doctor Sleep” (review here) is still an objective example of forcing a friend into a role that really isn’t right for him.

Part of the reason why there appears to be a double standard for Zombie/Zombie and Flanagan/Siegel may have to do with the fact that we rarely see Sheri in anything that isn’t directed by her husband. Kate Siegel on the other hand, shows up a little more often in non-Flanagan projects such as “Hypnotic,” so viewers might be less likely to so distinctly associate her exclusively with who she happens to be married to.

What does any of this have to do with the movie at hand, you might be wondering? Well, nothing really. It’s just that digressing into any other topic, even an argumentative one that’s only tangentially related, is better than talking about yet another generic ‘Netflix and Chills’ thriller. The editorializing above illustrates just how far a distracted mind will wander while wading through the placid waters of “Hypnotic.”

Kate Siegel plays Jenn, a down-on-her-luck woman whose down-in-the-dumps life could use a redirect. That redirect arrives when Jenn meets Dr. Meade, a hypnotherapist who secretly turns certain female patients into ‘Manchurian Candidates’ by implanting subconscious suggestions during their sessions.

One good thing about this setup, and good things are in short supply with “Hypnotic,” is that Jenn realizes what this doctor is doing before the 30-minute mark, so the plot doesn’t drag out the time taken for her to catch on to what the audience already knows from the get-go. It would be hard for anyone not to figure out Dr. Meade might be up to villainous deeds anyway, what with him wearing a black turtleneck, sipping scotch, and listening to opera music like cultured yet sinister doctors so often do in stereotypical cinema.

But from the telegraphed outcome of a dual location SWAT raid to what is probably the first ever use of ‘Chekhov’s EpiPen’ (How bad was his allergic reaction that he’s still hospitalized in a coma over one month later?), none of “Hypnotic’s” attempts at suspense succeed. Because there’s no deep mystery in play or juicy twist to ratchet up tension, we’re basically left waiting for the movie to inch toward exactly where it tells you it’s going within the first 10 minutes. And that waiting room is boringly built out of sterile rooms and long hallways that aren’t even close to visually engaging despite being lensed by veteran “X-Files” cinematographer John S. Bartley.

What does that give us? One more negligible release-of-the-week that will gradually become buried under more and more by-the-book movies as Netflix continues churning them out. Now do you see why I’d rather talk about anything else, even if that anything else was an analogy that stretched to connect a mediocre Kate Siegel vehicle to the worst fans of “Star Wars?”

Review Score: 50